Reflection Loops: Critique, Revision, and Better Reasoning
Participants organise critique, evidence and human decisions into workflows. In the Arena they first improve a judge, then keep the selected judge fixed while testing a generator change.
Collaboration level 4
Reflection
The collaboration separates construction, critique, revision, verification, and responsible judgment.
Course design relevance
What this level changes
Set criteria, check the evidence behind each finding, decide which changes to accept, and verify the revision.
Related units
Where this move becomes visible
Some units use the level as their primary move; others use it as a baseline or supporting collaboration condition.
Leadership, Responsibility, and Legitimation in Human-AI Systems
Participants learn that a plausible AI recommendation does not become a legitimate decision merely because a human approves it. They learn to design and test the decision rights, evidence requirements, escalation routes, and opportunities for contestation that make human responsibility substantive rather than symbolic.